Passionate Science. My purpose in writing this blog is to reach out to scientist and non-scientists alike and engage in lively exchange about issues in science, history of science, science and religion, science and ethics, science and philosophy, scientific challenging of extraordinary claims and questionable beliefs, science and politics, science education, and general communication between the scientific community and the lay public.
Translate
Tuesday, September 9, 2014
Science and Magic Part I: Astrology
One of
the earliest attempts by man to understand the universe and man’s place in it
was the study of astrology.
Early History
Astrology
is basically the study of the effects of the movements of the planets and the
stars on human activities. The study of astrology dates back to the days of the
Babylonians. Its principles were further developed by the Greeks and Romans and
later in the middle ages by the Arabs. The Egyptians, Indians, Persians, and
the Chinese all observed the planets and the stars in order to predict the
course of present and future events whether they were personal, political,
military or environmental (prediction of natural disasters).
One famous astrologer/ astronomer was Ptolemy (Claudius Ptolemaeus) who
lived in the second century in Alexandria, Egypt. He codified the astrological
tradition of the Babylonians and was responsible for coining such terms as
“planets ascendant in a solar or lunar house” or the “Age of Aquarius.” He set
out his astrological principles in his book “Tetrabiblos.” He thought that you
could predict a person’s appearance and temperament by knowing the positions of
the planets and the stars at the time of an individual’s birth.
In Ptolemy’s time, there was no clear distinction between astrology and
astronomy so that he also wrote about the motion of planets, the precession of
the equinoxes, and atmospheric friction.
He named the stars, listed their brightness, argued that the Earth was a
sphere, and set down rules for predicting eclipses. Ptolemy tried to understand
why planets at times exhibit a strange wandering motion known as retrograde
motion, which is the perception by an observer on Earth that a passing planet
is moving backwards. This effect occurs when one planet “on the inner lane” or
smaller orbit passes a slower moving planet with a larger orbit resulting in
each planet “seeing” the other one as apparently moving backwards. Ptolemy’s
idea of an Earth centered universe with all planets including the sun moving
around it had been known for thousands of years before his time. He imagined
that the planets orbiting the Earth were attached to transparent spheres via
little wheels. He built a mechanical
device that demonstrated planetary motion (in fact Archimedes is reported to
have built a similar device 400 years earlier). Ptolemy’s model was supported
by the church for centuries and probably prevented the advance of astronomy for
1000 years.
Importance of Astrology in the
16th century
During the 16th century in Europe people felt powerless in a
world full of famine, disease, and constant religious conflict. It is therefore
of little wonder that many people sought explanations for what was happening
around them in the certainty of the stars in the sky. Astrologers took
advantage of people’s fears by preparing nativities (horoscopes), which
predicted their future and told them what they should do.
Early “scientists” during the 16th century postulated that
the universe was comprised of 7 stars or planets that included the Sun, the
Moon, Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Venus and Mercury. These bodies constantly shifted
their position in relation to the Earth against a backdrop of the stars forming
the 12 signs of the zodiac. A horoscope was a map of the positions of these
bodies in the heavens at some future point in time in order to predict what
influence the heavens would have on any given occasion.
As strange as it may seem to us today, the doctrines of astrology at the
beginning of the 16th century in Europe was an essential part of the
intellectual framework accepted by most educated people at the time. These
doctrines taught that there were 4 elements earth, air, water, and fire that
these were constantly combining and recombining dependent on the movements of
the planets and the stars. It was believed that all physical change was
comprised of the interaction of the physiological qualities of heat and cold,
dryness and moisture. It was considered necessary to understand astrology in
order to understand the physiology of medicine. The stars were also thought to
affect plants and minerals (botany and metallurgy) as well as psychology and
ethnography. Astrology pervaded all aspects of scientific thought.
Astrologers were very influential in medieval times and physicians also
consulted horoscopes to know how best to treatment patients.
Paracelsus’s ideas were based on believing that god provided a remedy
for every disease and that the stars influenced human behavior and destinies
(astrology and alchemy were considered scientific pursuits in those days).
Types of Astrological Practice
In the 16th and 17th centuries, astrology or
judicial astrology (since the term astrology was considered synonymous with
astronomy in those days) was divided into 4 fields those of the general
predictions, nativities, elections, and horary questions. General predictions took
into account the movements of the heavens (including eclipses of the sun and
moon) in order to forecast the weather, the state of crops, questions of
mortality, epidemics, and those of politics and war. The nativities were maps
of the sky at the time of a person’s birth that were created in order to predict a person’s
prospects for the future. Elections were all about giving advice about choosing
the right moment for the right actions by comparing a person’s horoscope with
what was known about the future movements of the heavens, Horary questions,
the most controversial of the services offered by the astrologer, were based on
the state of the heavens at the time of the “birth of the mind.” For instance
if a person had a medical question he would provide the astrologer with a
sample of urine and the astrologer’s answer would be his interpretation of the
sky at the moment the urine was voided. However, every personal question could
be answered as a horary question. (see Religion and the Decline of Magic by
Keith Thomas. Penguin Books, London, 1971. pp 337-347)
Famous Practitioners of
Astrology
Astrologers (those practicing
astrology and preparing horoscopes) at first only consulted kings. Astrologers were very influential in medieval times
e.g. monarchs such as Elizabeth I had her own astrologer, John Dee. Other
famous scientists were also astrologers including Tycho Brahe, Johannes Kepler
and even Galileo Galilee. Physicians
also consulted horoscopes to know how best to treatment patients (e.g. William
Harvey the discoverer of blood circulation). Other 17th century scientists who
believed or practiced astrology included Edmund Gunter the mathematician, and
Henry Oldenburg (a president of the Royal Society). Isaac Newton
also had an interest in astrology as a young man and it might have been his
interest in astrology that led him to astronomy
Up to the 18th century the heavens and the universe were
viewed as the perfect creation of god. However it became increasingly difficult
to defend this idea due, for instance, to the discoveries of sunspots and
that the surface of the moon was not smooth but riddled with craters by
Galileo, and the observation by Tycho Brahe that comets traveled higher than
the moon when passing over the Earth. This indicated that
the universe was corrupt and changeable. Edmond Halley showed that the
appearance of comets in 1531, 1607, and 1682 were all the same one and he
correctly predicted that the next appearance would be in 1758.
Modern Attitudes and a
Criticism of Astrology
Even today according to a Gallup poll held in 2005 based on telephone
calls to around 1000 people, approximately 25% of Americans believe
that the position of the stars and planets can affect people’s lives. There are
according to Carl Sagan, 10,000 astrologers in the US and approximately 3000
astronomers and in France more astrologers than Roman Catholic clergy (see the
Demon Haunted World by Carl Sagan, Ballantine Books, NY 1996 pp 302-304). These
numbers fly in the face of the fact there is no evidence that astrology works.
Other facts call astrology into question e.g. the constellations
of stars identified to be important in determining horoscopes have changed
their positions over time (over 30 degrees). For instance, the original position of the
constellation Aries in ancient Greece was pinpointed at its position at the
spring equinox. However over the millennia since that time, the sign of Aries is
no longer where it originally was. Astrologers however continue to calculate
horoscopes based on the old position rather than allowing the position of Aries
to move with the equinoxes.
In addition, the only planets that are considered by astrologers are
those that can be seen with the naked eye. They do not take into account any
newly discovered astronomical objects (e.g. near earth asteroids). Astronomers
are inconsistent with the information they require to calculate the position of
stars and planets at the time of a subjects birth e.g. the time at birth is
taken into consideration but not the latitude and longitude of where a person
was born (since this would also affect the observed position of the planets).
It has been shown that different astrologers make different predictions when
given the same data to start,that there is a lack of correlation of predictions for identical
twins, and no correlation has been shown between horoscopes and psychological
tests such as the Minnesota
Multiphasic Personality Inventory.
Multiphasic Personality Inventory.
The popularity of astrology may have something to do with the selective bias
of people who have horoscopes done i.e. that they tend to remember predictions
that confirm what they want to believe and conveniently forget those
predictions that are false. Perhaps one can consider belief in astrology as
somewhere between religion and psychotherapy.
References:
- Science in Medieval Islam by Howard R. Turner. University of Texas Press, Austin1997. pp 108-111
- Cosmos by Carl Sagan. Random House, New York 1980. pp 48-51
- Religion and the Decline of Magic by Keith Thomas. Penguin Books, London, 1971. pp 337-347
Sunday, March 30, 2014
Paracelsus
the real Dr Faust?
Science
in the middle east under Islam was very advanced compared to Europe. This
applied to astronomy, geography, and mathematics, and medicine. The writings of
the Roman physician Galen, the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates, and the Greek
pharmacist Dioscredis were translated into Arabic and were used as a major
source of medical knowledge by Persian scholars such as al Razi and Ibn Sina
(Avincenna) who both lived in 11th century Persia. These men’s writings were
very influential until the 16th and 17 centuries in Europe.
Based on these early writings passed down through the centuries, physicians
in medieval England for instance were taught about the 4 humors (blood, phlegm,
yellow bile and black bile) described by Galen. A diagnosis consisted for the
most part of determining which of the humors was out of balance and trying to
reestablish the normal balance by either bloodletting (by applying leeches or by
venesection) or purging (using enemas), or inducing vomiting. These kinds of treatments
often caused more harm than good.
One man living at this time, who opposed theses mindless practices of
physicians, was Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim (1493- 1541) more commonly
known as Paracelsus. He is considered one of the fathers of the modern practice
of medicine.
Paracelsus publicly broke with the past by burning the books of Galen
and Avicenna and proclaiming that direct experience of patient’s symptoms was superior
to following the writings of ancient authorities.
He was the first to consider looking closely at the symptoms of a patient
to determine the cause of their disease instead of merely referring to the old
texts of Galen and Avicenna. Paracelsus believed that the causes of diseases originated
outside of the body. He thought that the causes of diseases came mainly from minerals
and poisons originating in the stars.
His ideas were based on believing that god provided a remedy for every
disease and that the stars influenced human behavior and destinies (astrology
and alchemy were considered scientific pursuits in those days). This insight of Paracelsus (although not
correct) led future generations of doctors to search for causes of disease
outside of the body leading eventually to the discovery of pathogens (e.g. bacteria
and viruses) as causes of disease. He believed in the search for new treatments
for diseases rather than relying on the old texts of Galen.
Paracelsus was an alchemist who studied the ancient texts of the Arabs
(who learned from the Chinese). He called for the search by alchemists for metals and minerals to
be used in the treatment of diseases in additional to the commonly used herbal medicines
of the time. He observed the ailments of miners in Villach, Switzerland and
wrote a book (“On the Miners’ Sickness and Other Miner’s Diseases”), which was published
25 year after his death but was very influential for centuries afterward. The
"miner's sickness" affected the lungs and induced ulcers due to miners breathing
in the dust of the minerals in the mines and due to their having contact with
poisons via the skin. He was able to
distinguish between chronic and acute poisoning and noticed the differences
between diseases caused by exposure to arsenic, antimony, or to alkalis (e.g.
oxides of magnesium, potassium, or calcium). He accurately predicted the symptoms
of mercury poisoning (shivering, gastrointestinal disorders, blackening of the
teeth, putrefaction of the mouth) and developed a treatment for it. This
consisted of creating openings in the body for the mercury to escape by
applying corrosive plasters to the skin or by prescribing baths. This type of
therapy is still used today. Paracelsus thought more of the folk medicine of
the peasants than he did of the remedies prescribed by the established doctors
of his time.
Alchemist in Paracelus’s day, believed boiling liquid substances
released spirits and the technique of distillation was devised to capture the
spirits as they arose from the boiling liquids. They were convinced that these spirits were powerful
especially after drinking them. Actually, alcoholic beverages are sometimes still
referred to as spirits.
Paracelsus made progress in the field of chemistry but for the wrong
reasons. He believed in the existence of vital spirits who inhabited the
different organs of the body (he called them archaei). The vital spirits were
spread by the arteries through the body, for example to the ventricles of the
brain becoming the animal spirit, and passing through the nerves giving motion
to the body. These archaei were little creatures who took human form and controlled
the functioning of the stomach, liver and heart. For whatever reason, it was the
intuitive and mythical approach of Parcelsus that advanced the study chemistry
until its revolutionary development in the 18th century. This made Paracelus
the undisputed founder of modern chemistry.
He was the first to write about there being a miniature man in all sperm
cells (the homunculus). This was before it was understood that chromosomes and
genes in sperm combine and fertilize the egg cell eventually lead to the
development of an embryo and a human being.
Parcelsus realized that the dose of a medicine made the difference
between being able to treat a person’s disease successfully and poisoning him.
He also believed that sometimes it was better to not do anything rather than to resort to the invasive practices commonly used by
physicians.
He divided “drugs” into different categories according the disease that
they were meant to treat rather than according to the tables of Galen who divided
drugs according to the humors that they were meant to treat.
Paracelcus was immortalized by the playwright Christopher Marlowe (1564-1593
a contemporary of Shakespeare) in his play the “Tragical History of Doctor
Faustus.” It tells the story of an alchemist who was willing to forgo salvation
and live in hell in order to gain power over the mysteries of nature. Two
centuries later, Goethe also wrote a poem about Doctor Faustus which makes
reference to the life and opinions of Paracelsus as well as his opinions, alchemical
symbolism, and the cabbala.
References
Paracelsus Magic into Science by Henry Pachter; Henry Schuman, New York.
1951 pp 14, 56
The Discoverers by Daniel J. Boorstin. Random
House Inc, New York, Toronto. 1983. pp 338-344
Science
in History by JD Bernal. C.A. Watts and Co. Ltd., London. 1965. pp 272-273
Religion and the Decline of Magic by Keith
Thomas. Penguin Books Ltd. London 1991.
pp 271
Saturday, March 8, 2014
A
Lesser known contemporary of Tycho Brahe and Johannes Kepler
It is generally thought that Jews made no contribution to the
advancement of the natural sciences during the middle ages and the Renaissance.
The reason for this is that Jew's lives were precarious in those days due to rampant
religious persecution and the general instability in Europe in those days. Jews had no time for scientific pursuits
because they had to struggle for survival or were constantly on the move.
One exception to this is David Gans a contemporary of Galileo and Kepler,
who was a Talmud scholar historian, mathematician, astronomer and geographer.
He was born in Lippstadt, Germany in 1541 (died 1613). He was educated
in Bonn and Frankfurt by famous talmudist teachers and attended the yeshiva in Cracow
that was headed by Moses Isserles. Isserles encouraged Gans to study
philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, geography, and history. He came to Prague in
1564 and was taught by two brothers Sinai ben Bezalel and Jehuda ben Bezalel
also known as Rabbi Loew and as the Maharal of Prague (the legendary rabbi who
was supposed to have conjured up the Golem). In the late 1560’s, Gans studied
Euclidian geometry and mathematics in Nordheim. Because of the relatively
peaceful and tolerant atmosphere enjoyed by the Jewish
community in Prague at the end of the 16th century and the beginning of the 17th century, outstanding Jews were allowed to have contact with the Christian community. David Gans established contact with Tycho Brahe and his assistant Johann Müller as well as with Johannes Kepler.
community in Prague at the end of the 16th century and the beginning of the 17th century, outstanding Jews were allowed to have contact with the Christian community. David Gans established contact with Tycho Brahe and his assistant Johann Müller as well as with Johannes Kepler.
In his book Nehmad ve-naim (“The Pleasant and the Dear” written in
Hebrew), Gans reports that he participated in three different observations made
in Tycho Brahe’s observatory in Benátky nad jizerou and that he had translated
the Alphosine tables from Hebrew into German. The Alphosine tables were created
in 1252 upon commission by Alphonso X of Castile in Toledo Spain. These were
tables used to determine the positions of the sun, moon, and the planets
relative to the fixed positions of stars. Interestingly Gans also knew of the
work of Copernicus (concerning the heliocentric theory stating that the sun and
not the earth was the center of the solar system). Gans however preferred the
system of Ptolemy with an earth centered solar system (Ptolemy was educated by
Jewish teachers in his day).
The Nehmad ve-naim is considered to be a unique book written by a Jewish
Ashkenazi author of that time that summed up all existing knowledge by both Jewish
and non-Jewish scholars on geometry, astronomy, and mathematical geography. It
is interesting to note that the book was written during a time of relative
conservatism among Central European Jews at that time. His book however
remained neglected and was not printed until the 18the century.
David Gans is perhaps best known for his historical work "Zemach David" (the
Wand of David) which consisted of a history of the Jews from biblical times
till 1592 (considered by him as the sacred part), and a more general history of
the world. Also interesting in this work is that it presents a summary of the humanities
during the Renaissance from the point of view of a Jewish scholar.
It is a stroke of luck that we know about David Gans and his
accomplishments making him an exception to the rule that Jews did not
contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the natural sciences in the
middle ages. I would suggest that he is at the tip of an ice berg of possibly many
more unknown heroes in science.
Source:
RyBar Citibor. 1991 TV Spektrum in cooperation with Akropolis Publishers
Jewish Prague (Notes on History and Culture, A Guidebook). pp 155-159
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)